Prediction of Magnus Tideman vs Charles Bud Cox Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Tideman vs C. Bud Cox

Magnus Tideman

SWE

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

149

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Charles Bud Cox

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

149

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Tideman 1 - 0 Cox

They have played 3 sets in total, with Magnus Tideman winning 2 and Charles Bud Cox winning 1. The last match between Magnus Tideman and Charles Bud Cox was at the Hanko CH, 14-07-1986, Round: R4, Surface: Clay, with Magnus Tideman getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Tideman	1
Cox	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R4) Hanko CH(07-14-86)

Stats

Magnus Tideman

Charles Bud Cox

M. Tideman vs C. B. Cox H2H Profile

M. Tideman	Stats	C. B. Cox
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
42.02% (50-69)	Career Total W/L	40.54% (30-44)
1	Clay	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Tideman vs C. B. Cox Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Magnus Tideman has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Charles Bud Cox has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Magnus Tideman, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Charles Bud Cox has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Magnus Tideman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Charles Bud Cox has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Magnus Tideman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Charles Bud Cox winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Magnus Tideman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 39/49), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Charles Bud Cox has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 14/18), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/3).
Player level: In the last year, Magnus Tideman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Charles Bud Cox has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Magnus Tideman winning 1 times and Charles Bud Cox being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Magnus Tideman winning 2 and Charles Bud Cox winning 1.
The last match between Magnus Tideman and Charles Bud Cox was at the Hanko CH, 14-07-1986, Round: R4, Surface: Clay, with Magnus Tideman getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Magnus Tideman has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Charles Bud Cox has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Magnus Tideman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Charles Bud Cox has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Magnus Tideman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Charles Bud Cox has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Magnus Tideman vs Charles Bud Cox Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Tideman vs C. B. Cox H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Tideman	Stats	C. B. Cox
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
15	Games Won	14
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Tideman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Stuttgart Outdoor - 24-07-1989
R2 Marian VajdaM. Vajda	L	3-6 6-1 6-2	Stats
Croydon CH - 13-02-1989
R4 Scott WarnerS. Warner	L	6-7 6-3 7-6	Stats
R3 Peter BastiansenP. Bastiansen	W	7-6 6-4	Stats
Pescara CH - 22-08-1988
R3 Alejandro AramburuA. Aramburu	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
Stuttgart Outdoor - 11-07-1988
R2 Mansour BahramiM. Bahrami	L	6-4 3-6 7-6	Stats

View All

C. B. Cox Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
San Luis Potosi CH - 29-03-1988
R3 Jaime TeandonJ. Teandon	L	7-5 3-6 7-5	Stats
Nairobi CH - 22-02-1988
R4 Giovanni Lelli MamiG. Lelli	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
R3 Glenny SchaapG. Schaap	W	4-6 7-6 15-13	Stats
Liege CH - 15-02-1988
R3 Wolfgang PoppW. Popp	L	6-4 4-6 6-1	Stats
Guaruja - 25-01-1988
R3 Cesar KistC. Kist	W	6-2 6-4	Stats

View All

M. Tideman vs C. B. Cox Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Tideman	Stats	C. B. Cox
42.02% (50/69)	YTD Win/Loss	40.54% (30/44)
43.15% (126/166)	Sets Win/Loss	42.78% (77/103)
46.87% (1281/1452)	Games Win/Loss	48.23% (883/948)
43.48% (10/13)	Hard Win/Loss	41.18% (14/20)
44.32% (39/49)	Clay Win/Loss	43.75% (14/18)
14.29% (1/6)	Indoor Hard W/L	40.00% (2/3)
0.00% (0/1)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/3)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
498.4	Average Opponent Rank	517.18
50.00% (3/3)	Slam W/L	0.00% (0/3)
0.00% (0/1)	Masters W/L	50.00% (1/1)
26.19% (11/31)	Main Tour W/L	28.57% (6/15)
51.43% (36/34)	Challenger W/L	47.92% (23/25)
41% (46/111)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	42% (29/69)
50% (3/6)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/3)
50% (23/46)	Deciding Set Win %	45% (14/31)
75% (53/40)	1st Set Won, Won Match	74% (27/20)
25% (53/13)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	26% (27/7)
15% (66/10)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (45/9)